Solomon v. Gold
This text of 2 Misc. 2d 397 (Solomon v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from, which denied the motion of intervenor-judgment-creditor to vacate the judgment entered on confession, is not. appealable as of course (N. Y. City [398]*398Mun. Ct. Code, § 154). Leave to appeal not having been obtained, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it (Horwits v. Kirkwood, 182 Misc. 638).
The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs.
Eder, Sohreiber and Heoht, JJ., concur.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Misc. 2d 397, 146 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-gold-nyappterm-1955.