Solomon v. Franco

California Court of Appeal

Solomon v. Franco

297 P. 121, 112 Cal. App. 679, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 19, 1931

DocketDocket No. 7502.

StatusPublished

This text of 297 P. 121 (Solomon v. Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solomon v. Franco, 297 P. 121, 112 Cal. App. 679, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] The respondent having in open court consented to remit all the judgment above the sum of $249, and it appearing to the court that there is nothing involved in the appeal except the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and it further appearing that the evidence is fully sufficient to support a judgment in that amount, the judgment is modified to read $249 and as so modified is affirmed, respondent to recover costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] The respondent having in open court consented to remit all the judgment above the sum of $249, and it appearing to the court that there is nothing involved in the appeal except the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and it further appearing that the evidence is fully sufficient to support a judgment in that amount, the judgment is modified to read $249 and as so modified is affirmed, respondent to recover costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 P. 121, 112 Cal. App. 679, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-franco-calctapp-1931.