Solomon v. City of New York
This text of 15 A.D.2d 927 (Solomon v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Such affirmance, however, is without prejudice, if the respective parties be so advised: (a) to a prompt motion at Special Term for leave to add Giaquinto as a party defendant, to serve a supplemental summons upon it, and to serve an amended complaint upon it and the defendant city; and (b) to a motion at Special Term to dismiss the action as against Giaquinto in the event that the motion first mentioned be not made within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [21 Misc 2d 836.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 927, 226 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1962.