Solomon v. City of New York
This text of 512 N.E.2d 546 (Solomon v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as concluded that the trial court erred in granting judgment to the city on its third-party complaint against La Crosse for contractual indemnification (111 AD2d 383, 387-388).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 N.E.2d 546, 70 N.Y.2d 675, 518 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1987.