Solomon v. City of New York

512 N.E.2d 546, 70 N.Y.2d 675, 518 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17324
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 512 N.E.2d 546 (Solomon v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. City of New York, 512 N.E.2d 546, 70 N.Y.2d 675, 518 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17324 (N.Y. 1987).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as concluded that the trial court erred in granting judgment to the city on its third-party complaint against La Crosse for contractual indemnification (111 AD2d 383, 387-388).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wisniewski v. Kings Plaza Shopping Center of Flatbush Avenue, Inc.
279 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Rosario v. New York City Housing Authority
230 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 N.E.2d 546, 70 N.Y.2d 675, 518 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1987.