Solomon v. City of New York
512 N.E.2d 546, 70 N.Y.2d 675, 518 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17324
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as concluded that the trial court erred in granting judgment to the city on its third-party complaint against La Crosse for contractual indemnification (111 AD2d 383, 387-388).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solomon v. City of New York, 512 N.E.2d 546, 70 N.Y.2d 675, 518 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17324 (N.Y. 1987).
512 N.E.2d 546 (Solomon v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weiss v. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd.
E.D. New York, 2025
Wisniewski v. Kings Plaza Shopping Center of Flatbush Avenue, Inc.
279 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Rosario v. New York City Housing Authority
230 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)