Solomon v. Breazeal

27 Ga. 200
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 Ga. 200 (Solomon v. Breazeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Breazeal, 27 Ga. 200 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin J.

delivering the opinion.

The only question in this case is, as to the definiteness of die levy. It is of the interest of the defendant in certain ¡slaves, and refers to a deed of record showing what that interest is.

No case decided by this Court controls this. Here, the instrument of writing referred to, shows the interest of the defendants in the property, and that is what is levied on. And if there be doubt or uncertainty resulting from Ihe construction of the deed, or from outside facts — such as the number of children, &c,. — that the purchaser must ascertain for himself. It is neither the duty of the creditor or the Sheriff to do this. And it would be dangerous so to hold.

Judgment reversed.

McDonald J. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Gilly
66 S.E. 263 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Brown v. Chambers
63 Tex. 131 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
Sears v. Bagwell
69 Ga. 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ga. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-breazeal-ga-1859.