Solomon v. Baar
255 A.D. 849, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5629
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 25, 1938·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [168 Misc. 439.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solomon v. Baar, 255 A.D. 849, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
255 A.D. 849 (Solomon v. Baar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Dentine
27 A.D.2d 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Pisano v. County of Nassau
41 Misc. 2d 844 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
McClellan Agency, Inc. v. Cunningham, Nielsen & Molloy, Inc.
22 Misc. 2d 372 (New York County Courts, 1960)
Bornstein v. Levine
7 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)