Solomon v. Baar
255 A.D. 849, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5629
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 25, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 255 A.D. 849 (Solomon v. Baar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solomon v. Baar, 255 A.D. 849, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [168 Misc. 439.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Dentine
27 A.D.2d 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Pisano v. County of Nassau
41 Misc. 2d 844 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
McClellan Agency, Inc. v. Cunningham, Nielsen & Molloy, Inc.
22 Misc. 2d 372 (New York County Courts, 1960)
Bornstein v. Levine
7 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 849, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-baar-nyappdiv-1938.