Solomon Kofi Equam v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 12, 2012
Docket14-11-00105-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Solomon Kofi Equam v. State (Solomon Kofi Equam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon Kofi Equam v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order filed July 12, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00105-CR ____________

SOLOMON KOFI EQUAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1210061

ORDER

Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief under the authority of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738(1967), in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. To comply with the requirements set forth in Anders, counsel must file: (1) a copy of the transmittal letter to the client accompanying his copy of the Anders brief in which the client is informed of his right to file a pro se brief and obtain a record view; and (2) a Motion to Withdraw. Accordingly, we enter the following order. We order Edmond N. O'Suji, to file a copy of the transmittal letter on or before July 23, 2012. Further, we order Edmond N. O'Suji to file a motion to withdraw on or before July 23, 2012.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Solomon Kofi Equam v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-kofi-equam-v-state-texapp-2012.