Solomon Kofi Equam v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 23, 2012·No. 14-11-00105-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed August 23, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00105-CR

SOLOMON KOFI EQUAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1210061

ORDER

Appellant’s retained counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel filed a motion to withdraw which has been granted. See See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5. Before considering the merits of this appeal, we provide appellant the opportunity to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 184th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before September 7, 2012; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solomon Kofi Equam v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Solomon Kofi Equam v. State (Solomon Kofi Equam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)