Soloky v. Cooke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Soloky v. Cooke

116 S.E.2d 166, 253 N.C. 62, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 453

DecidedSeptember 21, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E.2d 166 (Soloky v. Cooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soloky v. Cooke, 116 S.E.2d 166, 253 N.C. 62, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 453 (N.C. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon careful consideration of the evidence shown in the record of case on appeal taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it appears sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and the verdict is adequate to support the judgment.

The record indicates that the trial was conducted in accordance with law, and error for which the verdict and judgment should be disturbed is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment from which appeal is taken there is ■

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Upon careful consideration of the evidence shown in the record of case on appeal taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it appears sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and the verdict is adequate to support the judgment.

The record indicates that the trial was conducted in accordance with law, and error for which the verdict and judgment should be disturbed is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment from which appeal is taken there is ■

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E.2d 166, 253 N.C. 62, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soloky-v-cooke-nc-1960.