Soloff v. U-Totem, Inc. of Broward

Supreme Court of Florida

Soloff v. U-Totem, Inc. of Broward

216 So. 2d 2

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 3, 1968·No. No. 37241·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date January 29, 1968, and the Petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said Petition be and the same is hereby denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is hereby denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date January 29, 1968, and the Petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said Petition be and the same is hereby denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is hereby denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Soloff v. U-Totem, Inc. of Broward, 216 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

216 So. 2d 2 (Soloff v. U-Totem, Inc. of Broward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related