Solmoro v. McDonald
This text of Solmoro v. McDonald (Solmoro v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 15-7004 Document: 2 Page: 1 Filed: 10/29/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
AMADA H. SOLMORO, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. ______________________
2015-7004 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 13-2097, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch. ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Upon review of this recently docketed case, it appears that Amada H. Solmoro’s appeal was not timely filed. It appears that on June 17, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in Solmoro’s case. Her notice of appeal was received on September 29, 2014, 104 days after judgment. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within 60 days Case: 15-7004 Document: 2 Page: 2 Filed: 10/29/2014
of the entry of judgment. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Solmoro is directed to show cause, within 45 days of the date of filing of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may also respond within that time. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
s30
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Solmoro v. McDonald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solmoro-v-mcdonald-cafc-2014.