Solla v. Solla

Connecticut Appellate Court

Solla v. Solla

489 A.2d 395, 3 Conn. App. 415, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 891

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 26, 1985

Docket2555

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 489 A.2d 395 (Solla v. Solla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solla v. Solla, 489 A.2d 395, 3 Conn. App. 415, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 891 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a routine dissolution of marriage action in which the defendant claims that the trial court rendered its judgment on the basis of erroneous facts. The particular facts found by the trial court, that the defendant was a high school gradu[416]*416ate and a construction worker, were not crucial to the judgment. The court based its financial awards upon the defendant’s net earnings, regardless of his occupation or education. A review of the record makes it clear that the monetary award to the plaintiff and the assignment of property to her were neither arbitrary nor an abuse of discretion. Anderson v. Anderson, 191 Conn. 46, 57, 463 A.2d 578 (1983).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a routine dissolution of marriage action in which the defendant claims that the trial court rendered its judgment on the basis of erroneous facts. The particular facts found by the trial court, that the defendant was a high school gradu[416]*416ate and a construction worker, were not crucial to the judgment. The court based its financial awards upon the defendant’s net earnings, regardless of his occupation or education. A review of the record makes it clear that the monetary award to the plaintiff and the assignment of property to her were neither arbitrary nor an abuse of discretion. Anderson v. Anderson, 191 Conn. 46, 57, 463 A.2d 578 (1983).

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 A.2d 395, 3 Conn. App. 415, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solla-v-solla-connappct-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack