Solis v. State

174 S.W. 343, 76 Tex. Crim. 230, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 1915·No. No. 3390.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault to murder and his punishment was assessed by the jury at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The Assistant Attorney General makes a motion to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception accompanying the record.' As they were not filed within the time permitted under the law, the motion must be sustained. And without a statement of facts and bills of exception there is no ground in the motion for new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solis v. State, 174 S.W. 343, 76 Tex. Crim. 230, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342 (Tex. 1915).

174 S.W. 343 (Solis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
630 S.W.2d 394 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Thurman v. State
286 S.W.2d 941 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Stapp v. State
147 S.W.2d 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Jupe v. State
217 S.W. 1041 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Thompson v. State
210 S.W. 800 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Eitel v. State
182 S.W. 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)