Solis v. State

174 S.W. 343, 76 Tex. Crim. 230, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 17, 1915
DocketNo. 3390.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 174 S.W. 343 (Solis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solis v. State, 174 S.W. 343, 76 Tex. Crim. 230, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342 (Tex. 1915).

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault to murder and his punishment was assessed by the jury at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The Assistant Attorney General makes a motion to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception accompanying the record.' As they were not filed within the time permitted under the law, the motion must be sustained. And without a statement of facts and bills of exception there is no ground in the motion for new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
630 S.W.2d 394 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Thurman v. State
286 S.W.2d 941 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Stapp v. State
147 S.W.2d 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Jupe v. State
217 S.W. 1041 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Thompson v. State
210 S.W. 800 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Eitel v. State
182 S.W. 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 S.W. 343, 76 Tex. Crim. 230, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solis-v-state-texcrimapp-1915.