Solis v. State
965 So. 2d 341, 2007 WL 2741999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 2007
Docket1D07-4278
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 965 So. 2d 341 (Solis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solis v. State, 965 So. 2d 341, 2007 WL 2741999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
Armando SOLIS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Armando Solis, pro se, Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
BARFIELD, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hollister v. Hollister
965 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
965 So. 2d 341, 2007 WL 2741999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solis-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.