Solis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Solis v. State

801 So. 2d 208, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17140, 2001 WL 1539613

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-230

StatusPublished

This text of 801 So. 2d 208 (Solis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solis v. State, 801 So. 2d 208, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17140, 2001 WL 1539613 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction following a nonjury trial because there was no valid waiver of jury trial by appellant, either orally or in writing. The record shows that only appellant’s counsel advised the court that appellant was waiving a jury. This, as the state recognizes in its concession of error, is insufficient. Babb v. State, 736 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Reversed.

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction following a nonjury trial because there was no valid waiver of jury trial by appellant, either orally or in writing. The record shows that only appellant’s counsel advised the court that appellant was waiving a jury. This, as the state recognizes in its concession of error, is insufficient. Babb v. State, 736 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Reversed.

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 So. 2d 208, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17140, 2001 WL 1539613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solis-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack