Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Solins v. Klosky

Solins v. Klosky

8 A.D.2d 848, 190 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7906
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.2d 848 (Solins v. Klosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solins v. Klosky, 8 A.D.2d 848, 190 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

In an action for the specific performance of a settlement agreement, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before a Special Referee directing the appellant, inter alla, to specifically perform the settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was entered into in open court. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 4.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Anders v. Anders, 6 A D 2d 440.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Katz v. Joseph Rae Enterprises, Inc.
51 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 848, 190 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solins-v-klosky-nyappdiv-1959.