Solins v. Klosky
8 A.D.2d 848, 190 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In an action for the specific performance of a settlement agreement, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before a Special Referee directing the appellant, inter alla, to specifically perform the settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was entered into in open court. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 4.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Anders v. Anders, 6 A D 2d 440.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solins v. Klosky, 8 A.D.2d 848, 190 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).
8 A.D.2d 848 (Solins v. Klosky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Katz v. Joseph Rae Enterprises, Inc.
51 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)