Solinger v. Egelston
13 Jones & S. 605
Opinion
The learned judge below followed the decision of Solinger v. Earle, impleaded, &c. (ante, p. 80), and his judgment must be [606] sustained. There has been at this term a motion for re-argument in Solinger v. Earle, which we have denied (ante, p. 604).
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Speir, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solinger v. Egelston, 13 Jones & S. 605 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).
13 Jones & S. 605 (Solinger v. Egelston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.