Solinger v. Egelston
13 Jones & S. 605
This text of 13 Jones & S. 605 (Solinger v. Egelston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solinger v. Egelston, 13 Jones & S. 605 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).
Opinion
The learned judge below followed the decision of Solinger v. Earle, impleaded, &c. (ante, p. 80), and his judgment must be [606]*606sustained. There has been at this term a motion for re-argument in Solinger v. Earle, which we have denied (ante, p. 604).
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Speir, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Jones & S. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solinger-v-egelston-nysuperctnyc-1879.