Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County v. Magill Properties, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County v. Magill Properties, Inc.

621 So. 2d 1091, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7378, 1993 WL 259572

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 14, 1993

DocketNos. 92-1199, 92-1830

StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 1091 (Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County v. Magill Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County v. Magill Properties, Inc., 621 So. 2d 1091, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7378, 1993 WL 259572 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a final judgment and order on cross-motions for attorney’s fees and appellees/cross-appellants appeal the same. We hold that the trial court erred in finding that Gibson & Adams, P.A. violated the Public Records Act without finding it necessary to reach the issue of whether Gibson & Adams, P.A. is a public agency. The record does not contain competent, substantial evidence to support the conduct of Gibson & Adams, P.A., under the circumstances of appellee’s request, constituting a violation of sections 119.07(l)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1989). Accordingly, we reverse that part of the final judgment and the order on cross-motions for attorney’s fees finding appellee entitled to recover attorney’s fees as to the public records issues in Counts II and III of the third amended complaint.

Finding the three issues on cross-appeal present no error and do not require discussion, we affirm the cross-appeal.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a final judgment and order on cross-motions for attorney’s fees and appellees/cross-appellants appeal the same. We hold that the trial court erred in finding that Gibson & Adams, P.A. violated the Public Records Act without finding it necessary to reach the issue of whether Gibson & Adams, P.A. is a public agency. The record does not contain competent, substantial evidence to support the conduct of Gibson & Adams, P.A., under the circumstances of appellee’s request, constituting a violation of sections 119.07(l)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (1989). Accordingly, we reverse that part of the final judgment and the order on cross-motions for attorney’s fees finding appellee entitled to recover attorney’s fees as to the public records issues in Counts II and III of the third amended complaint.

Finding the three issues on cross-appeal present no error and do not require discussion, we affirm the cross-appeal.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 So. 2d 1091, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7378, 1993 WL 259572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solid-waste-authority-of-palm-beach-county-v-magill-properties-inc-fladistctapp-1993.