Soles v. Sheppard

96 Ill. 131
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Scholfield, J.:

All that is shown by the affidavit filed in support of this motion is, that the attorney for the defendant in error made an agreement that he would enter the appearance of his client, and has violated that agreement. This might give a cause of action against the attorney, but it does not constitute an appearance. Mo scire facias has been served, nor has there been any publication, of notice. The defendant in error is not in court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soles v. Sheppard, 96 Ill. 131 (Ill. 1880).

96 Ill. 131 (Soles v. Sheppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaffner v. Appleman
70 Ill. App. 684 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)