Soles v. Sheppard

Illinois Supreme Court

Soles v. Sheppard

96 Ill. 131

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 Ill. 131 (Soles v. Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soles v. Sheppard, 96 Ill. 131 (Ill. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Scholfield, J.:

All that is shown by the affidavit filed in support of this motion is, that the attorney for the defendant in error made an agreement that he would enter the appearance of his client, and has violated that agreement. This might give a cause of action against the attorney, but it does not constitute an appearance. Mo scire facias has been served, nor has there been any publication, of notice. The defendant in error is not in court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scholfield, J.:

All that is shown by the affidavit filed in support of this motion is, that the attorney for the defendant in error made an agreement that he would enter the appearance of his client, and has violated that agreement. This might give a cause of action against the attorney, but it does not constitute an appearance. Mo scire facias has been served, nor has there been any publication, of notice. The defendant in error is not in court.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 Ill. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soles-v-sheppard-ill-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack