Soler v. Singletary
This text of 629 So. 2d 248 (Soler v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant/Petitioner Alberto Soler, appeals an order denying postconviction relief and filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.
The claims raised in Soler’s motion for postconviction relief either could have and should have been raised on direct appeal, or are legally insufficient to establish ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Swafford v. Dugger, 569 So.2d 1264 (Fla.1990); Lambrix v. State, 559 So.2d 1137, 1138 (Fla.1990); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Pope v. State, 569 So.2d 1241, 1245 (Fla.1990).
Turning our focus to Soler’s claims raised in the petition for writ of habeas corpus, we conclude they are either procedurally barred or are legally insufficient to establish ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. King v. Dugger, 555 So.2d 355 (Fla.1990); Suarez v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 190, 193 (Fla.1988).
Accordingly, the order denying postconviction relief is affirmed and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 So. 2d 248, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12295, 1993 WL 517214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soler-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1993.