Solemnick v. Solemnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Solemnick v. Solemnick

33 A.D.2d 1026, 308 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1026 (Solemnick v. Solemnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solemnick v. Solemnick, 33 A.D.2d 1026, 308 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, commenced on September 12, 1968 and brought under subdivision (5) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law upon the ground that the parties had lived apart for a period of more than two years pursuant to a judgment of separation entered on March 2,1942, defendant-wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 17, 1969 after a nonjury trial, as granted [1027]*1027plaintiff a dissolution of the marriage. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the authority of Gleason v. Gleason (26 N Y 2d 28); Schacht v. Schacht (32 A D 2d 201); Zientara v. Zientara (32 A D 2d 822). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, commenced on September 12, 1968 and brought under subdivision (5) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law upon the ground that the parties had lived apart for a period of more than two years pursuant to a judgment of separation entered on March 2,1942, defendant-wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 17, 1969 after a nonjury trial, as granted [1027]*1027plaintiff a dissolution of the marriage. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the authority of Gleason v. Gleason (26 N Y 2d 28); Schacht v. Schacht (32 A D 2d 201); Zientara v. Zientara (32 A D 2d 822). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1026, 308 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solemnick-v-solemnick-nyappdiv-1970.