Solemene v. Solemene
This text of 229 A.D. 728 (Solemene v. Solemene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. The continued existence of the separation agreement bars the granting of this motion. It does not satisfactorily appear in this record that the defendant breached the agreement or that the agreement did not subsist at the time of the commencement of this action. (Rosenblatt v. Rosenblatt, 209 App. Div. 373; Drane v. Drane, 207 id. 217; Brody v. Brody, 190 id. 806; Benesch v. Benesch, 182 id. 221; Beebe v. Beebe, 174 id. 408; Johnson v. Johnson, 206 N. Y. 561; Winter v. Winter, 191 id. 462.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solemene-v-solemene-nyappdiv-1930.