Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez

756 So. 2d 200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263, 2000 WL 368498
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. Nos. 3D98-257, 3D97-2656·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in any of the defendant-appellants’ claims of error and we therefore affirm on the main appeal. § 768.0425, Fla. Stat. (1999); HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So.2d 1238 (Fla.1996). On the cross-appeal, however, we conclude that the trial court erroneously denied the plaintiffs’ claim to pre-judgment interest. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985); State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Albert, 618 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So.2d 135 (Fla.1993); Charles Buzbee & Sons, Inc. v. Falkner, 585 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The cause is remanded solely for the purpose of adding that item, in the undisputed sum of $93,731.67, to the judgment under review nunc pro tunc its date, January 6,1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez, 756 So. 2d 200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263, 2000 WL 368498 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

756 So. 2d 200 (Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles Buzbee & Sons, Inc. v. Falkner
585 So. 2d 1190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Albert
618 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses
685 So. 2d 1238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.
474 So. 2d 212 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)