Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez

756 So. 2d 200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263, 2000 WL 368498

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 2000

DocketNos. 3D98-257, 3D97-2656

StatusPublished

This text of 756 So. 2d 200 (Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soleil Shutters, Inc. v. Martinez, 756 So. 2d 200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263, 2000 WL 368498 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in any of the defendant-appellants’ claims of error and we therefore affirm on the main appeal. § 768.0425, Fla. Stat. (1999); HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So.2d 1238 (Fla.1996). On the cross-appeal, however, we conclude that the trial court erroneously denied the plaintiffs’ claim to pre-judgment interest. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985); State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Albert, 618 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So.2d 135 (Fla.1993); Charles Buzbee & Sons, Inc. v. Falkner, 585 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The cause is remanded solely for the purpose of adding that item, in the undisputed sum of $93,731.67, to the judgment under review nunc pro tunc its date, January 6,1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in any of the defendant-appellants’ claims of error and we therefore affirm on the main appeal. § 768.0425, Fla. Stat. (1999); HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So.2d 1238 (Fla.1996). On the cross-appeal, however, we conclude that the trial court erroneously denied the plaintiffs’ claim to pre-judgment interest. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985); State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Albert, 618 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So.2d 135 (Fla.1993); Charles Buzbee & Sons, Inc. v. Falkner, 585 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The cause is remanded solely for the purpose of adding that item, in the undisputed sum of $93,731.67, to the judgment under review nunc pro tunc its date, January 6,1998.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

756 So. 2d 200, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4263, 2000 WL 368498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soleil-shutters-inc-v-martinez-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack