Solda v. Hanreddy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Solda v. Hanreddy

199 Ill. App. 366

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 1, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,533

StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. App. 366 (Solda v. Hanreddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solda v. Hanreddy, 199 Ill. App. 366 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Evidence, § 466*—when circumstantial evidence insufficient. When circumstantial evidence is relied on to prove a fact, the circumstances must be proved and not themselves presumed. 3. Evidence, § 23*—when one presumption not basis for another, A presumption of fact is not alone a legitimate foundation for a second presumption of fact. 4. Master and servant, § 683*—when evidence insufficient to support a verdict. In an action by a servant for personal injuries, evidence examined and held insufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Evidence, § 466*—when circumstantial evidence insufficient. When circumstantial evidence is relied on to prove a fact, the circumstances must be proved and not themselves presumed. 3. Evidence, § 23*—when one presumption not basis for another, A presumption of fact is not alone a legitimate foundation for a second presumption of fact. 4. Master and servant, § 683*—when evidence insufficient to support a verdict. In an action by a servant for personal injuries, evidence examined and held insufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ill. App. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solda-v-hanreddy-illappct-1916.