SOLAU v. State

1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 2009 WL 321603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2009·No. 4D08-2361·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the trial court demonstrating that his “deportation” based claim is both timely and sufficient. Prieto v. State, 989 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Brown v. State, 992 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007).

FARMER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SOLAU v. State, 1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 2009 WL 321603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

1 So. 3d 1249 (SOLAU v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prieto v. State
989 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Brown v. State
992 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)