SOLAU v. State

1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 2009 WL 321603
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
Docket4D08-2361
StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 1249 (SOLAU v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SOLAU v. State, 1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 2009 WL 321603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the trial court demonstrating that his “deportation” based claim is both timely and sufficient. Prieto v. State, 989 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Brown v. State, 992 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007).

FARMER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prieto v. State
989 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Brown v. State
992 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 2009 WL 321603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solau-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.