Solarz v. Manhattan Ry. Co.

32 N.Y.S. 1149

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 1149 (Solarz v. Manhattan Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solarz v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 32 N.Y.S. 1149 (superctny 1895).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and order are affirmed, with costs, on the opinion filed by McADAM, J., the learned trial judge (29 N. Y. Supp. 1123), upon the denial of the motion for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.
29 N.Y.S. 1123 (Superior Court of New York, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solarz-v-manhattan-ry-co-superctny-1895.