Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company
49 N.E. 1105, 155 N.Y. 645, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 956
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company, 49 N.E. 1105, 155 N.Y. 645, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 956 (N.Y. 1898).
49 N.E. 1105 (Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Talge Mahogany Co. v. Hockett
103 N.E. 815 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1914)
Brady v. City of New York
149 A.D. 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)