Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company
49 N.E. 1105, 155 N.Y. 645, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 956
This text of 49 N.E. 1105 (Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company, 49 N.E. 1105, 155 N.Y. 645, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 956 (N.Y. 1898).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Talge Mahogany Co. v. Hockett
103 N.E. 815 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1914)
Brady v. City of New York
149 A.D. 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 N.E. 1105, 155 N.Y. 645, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solarz-v-manhattan-railway-company-ny-1898.