Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.
11 Misc. 715, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 882
This text of 11 Misc. 715 (Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co., 11 Misc. 715, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 882 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The judgment and order are affirmed, with costs, on the opinion filed by McAdam, J., the learned trial judge, upon the denial of the motion for a new trial.
Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ingalls v. Monte Cristo Oil & Development Co.
139 P. 97 (California Court of Appeal, 1914)
Brady v. City of New York
149 A.D. 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Holloway v. McWilliams
97 A.D. 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Cunningham v. Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.
63 N.Y.S. 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Misc. 715, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solarz-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1895.