Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

Second Circuit

Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

666 F.2d 28, 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1699

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 3, 1981·No. Nos. 1382-1383, Dockets 81-6036, 81-7068·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from an order granting summary judgment, Milton Pollack, District Judge, 504 F.Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y.1981), entered on the motion of Kollsman Instrument Company, dismissing the complaint of the Trustees of District No. 15 Machinists’ Pension Fund, and denying motions of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Cqrporation for leave to serve a second- amended answer to the Trustees’ complaint and for summary judgment on behalf of Pension Benefit, we affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Pollack’s comprehensive, well considered opinion of January 6, 1981 which is officially reported.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from an order granting summary judgment, Milton Pollack, District Judge, 504 F.Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y.1981), entered on the motion of Kollsman Instrument Company, dismissing the complaint of the Trustees of District No. 15 Machinists’ Pension Fund, and denying motions of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Cqrporation for leave to serve a second- amended answer to the Trustees’ complaint and for summary judgment on behalf of Pension Benefit, we affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Pollack’s comprehensive, well considered opinion of January 6, 1981 which is officially reported.

Affirmed.

Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 666 F.2d 28, 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1699 (2d Cir. 1981).

Pincite

666 F.2d 28 (Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related