Solano v. State

965 So. 2d 1256, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15724, 2007 WL 2890125
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 2007
DocketNo. 5D07-2381
StatusPublished

This text of 965 So. 2d 1256 (Solano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solano v. State, 965 So. 2d 1256, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15724, 2007 WL 2890125 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although labeled a petition for belated appeal, what Petitioner really contends is that he timely filed a rule 3.850 motion, but it was lost and never addressed by the trial court. Because this petition involves issues of fact for resolution by the trial court, we transfer this petition to the circuit court to determine if Petitioner is entitled to relief. See Mathews v. State, 958 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (reversing trial court’s summary denial of motion for leave to refile 3.850 motion where defendant alleged he timely filed rule 3.850' motion that was apparently lost or misplaced after delivery to prison officials).

PETITION TRANSFERRED.

PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mathews v. State
958 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
965 So. 2d 1256, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15724, 2007 WL 2890125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solano-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.