Solano, Anastasia Mikal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 27, 2012·No. 05-12-00659-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November~ ,2012

In The Court of Ippeals itth istmt of Texas at aIlas No. 05-12-00659-CR

ANASTASIA MIKAL SOLANO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-1-0242

ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 22, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to

pursue the appeal; (2) appellant ~s indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel; (3)

counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) counsel

told the trial court she would file appellant’s brief by December 3, 2012.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to

counsel for all parties.

DAVID L. BRIDGES/ JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solano, Anastasia Mikal v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Solano, Anastasia Mikal v. State (Solano, Anastasia Mikal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.