Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2021·No. 82082·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DWIGHT CONRAD SOLANDER, No. 82082 Appellant,

vs.

JEREMY BEAN, WARDEN HDSP, Respondent. APR 2 2021 ELIZAR A. BROWN CLE BY

CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

In response to an order of this court, the Attorney General advises that appellant has been released on parole. Thus, this appeal is moot. See Williams v. State, Dep't of Corr., 133 Nev. 594, 600 n.7, 402 P.3d 1260, 1265 n.7 (2017) (providing that when considering the computation of sentence credits that would make an inmate eligible for parole, "no relief can be afforded where the offender has already expired the sentence or appeared before the parole board on the sentence (internal citation omitted)). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

GA4

, J.

Cadish

Pieku , J.

Pickering Herndon

'Given this order, appellant's motion for an extension of time to file an opening brief is denied as moot.

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 21 Dwight Conrad Solander Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2021).

Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden (Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.