Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden
This text of Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden (Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DWIGHT CONRAD SOLANDER, No. 82082 Appellant, vs. JEREMY BEAN, WARDEN HDSP, Respondent. APR 2 2021 ELIZAR A. BROWN CLE BY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In response to an order of this court, the Attorney General advises that appellant has been released on parole. Thus, this appeal is moot. See Williams v. State, Dep't of Corr., 133 Nev. 594, 600 n.7, 402 P.3d 1260, 1265 n.7 (2017) (providing that when considering the computation of sentence credits that would make an inmate eligible for parole, "no relief can be afforded where the offender has already expired the sentence or appeared before the parole board on the sentence (internal citation omitted)). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
GA4 , J. Cadish
Pieku , J. Pickering Herndon
'Given this order, appellant's motion for an extension of time to file an opening brief is denied as moot. cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 21 Dwight Conrad Solander Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Solander (Dwight) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solander-dwight-vs-warden-nev-2021.