Sol Mor Novelty Co. v. Northwestern National Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sol Mor Novelty Co. v. Northwestern National Insurance

60 A.D.2d 543, 400 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14461

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 543 (Sol Mor Novelty Co. v. Northwestern National Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sol Mor Novelty Co. v. Northwestern National Insurance, 60 A.D.2d 543, 400 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 18, 1977, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s interrogatories, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion to vacate the interrogatories in their entirety is granted, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant, and without prejudice to the propounding of proper interrogatories. Sol Mor Novelty Co., Inc., had stored merchandise in a warehouse. The merchandise was allegedly insured under a marine open cargo policy issued by Northwestern National Insurance Company. The warehouse premises were burglarized and Sol Mor demanded payment under the terms of the policy from Northwestern. The claim was rejected by Northwestern. This lawsuit was initiated by Sol Mor by service of a summons and complaint. After joinder of issue, the plaintiff served interrogatories upon Northwestern. The defendant moved at Special Term to vacate the interrogatories. The motion was denied. We would reverse. The complaint contained but 11 paragraphs. The answer contains eight paragraphs and an additional 15 paragraphs articulating four affirmative defenses and one counterclaim or offset. Plaintiff’s demand for the interrogatories contained 72 questions which, together with subsidiary questions, amounted to 122 separate interrogatories. The interrogatories in the main deal with minutiae and irrelevancies and, in our view, are oppressive and harassing. Their mere number in relation to the simple complaint and answer is indicative of their nit-picking nature. The relatively simple issues outlined in the pleadings do not warrant the unreasonably detailed interrogatories propounded. Under the circumstances, rather than prune the numerous palpably improper questions, we have vacated the entire demand (Heimowitz v Handler, Kleiman, Sukenik & Segal, P. C., 51 AD2d 702; Woodmere Academy v Steinberg, 51 AD2d 514). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Capozzoli, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 18, 1977, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s interrogatories, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion to vacate the interrogatories in their entirety is granted, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant, and without prejudice to the propounding of proper interrogatories. Sol Mor Novelty Co., Inc., had stored merchandise in a warehouse. The merchandise was allegedly insured under a marine open cargo policy issued by Northwestern National Insurance Company. The warehouse premises were burglarized and Sol Mor demanded payment under the terms of the policy from Northwestern. The claim was rejected by Northwestern. This lawsuit was initiated by Sol Mor by service of a summons and complaint. After joinder of issue, the plaintiff served interrogatories upon Northwestern. The defendant moved at Special Term to vacate the interrogatories. The motion was denied. We would reverse. The complaint contained but 11 paragraphs. The answer contains eight paragraphs and an additional 15 paragraphs articulating four affirmative defenses and one counterclaim or offset. Plaintiff’s demand for the interrogatories contained 72 questions which, together with subsidiary questions, amounted to 122 separate interrogatories. The interrogatories in the main deal with minutiae and irrelevancies and, in our view, are oppressive and harassing. Their mere number in relation to the simple complaint and answer is indicative of their nit-picking nature. The relatively simple issues outlined in the pleadings do not warrant the unreasonably detailed interrogatories propounded. Under the circumstances, rather than prune the numerous palpably improper questions, we have vacated the entire demand (Heimowitz v Handler, Kleiman, Sukenik & Segal, P. C., 51 AD2d 702; Woodmere Academy v Steinberg, 51 AD2d 514). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Capozzoli, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 543, 400 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sol-mor-novelty-co-v-northwestern-national-insurance-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack