Sol, Gary v. Saul, Andrew

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

"GARY A. SOL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-256-sle ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner’s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991). On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate, offer Plaintiff a new hearing, and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.

rH SO ORDERED this _1@ day of PECEABEL 2920.

HONORABLE STEPHEN L. CROCKER . United States Magistrate Judge