Home/Ninth Circuit/Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon

Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon

429 F.2d 982
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 1970
Docket25562_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 429 F.2d 982 (Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon, 429 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1970).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Upon the authority of Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970), the order for the return of the seized films is affirmed.

Since acquiescence with our decision can, we feel, be assumed until the contrary appears, the case is remanded with instructions that the injunction against future seizures be vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John Andrew Jacobs
513 F.2d 564 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Johnny Miles Hunt and Baron Raymon Kolb
496 F.2d 888 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Perial Amusement Corp. v. Morse
482 F.2d 515 (Second Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Black
356 F. Supp. 366 (W.D. New York, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 F.2d 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sol-d-maizels-v-george-van-hoomissen-district-attorney-for-multnomah-ca9-1970.