Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon
429 F.2d 982
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 14, 1970·No. 25562_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
Upon the authority of Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970), the order for the return of the seized films is affirmed.
Since acquiescence with our decision can, we feel, be assumed until the contrary appears, the case is remanded with instructions that the injunction against future seizures be vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon, 429 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1970).
429 F.2d 982 (Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. John Andrew Jacobs
513 F.2d 564 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Johnny Miles Hunt and Baron Raymon Kolb
496 F.2d 888 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Perial Amusement Corp. v. Morse
482 F.2d 515 (Second Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Black
356 F. Supp. 366 (W.D. New York, 1973)