Sokoot v. Przeniczny
This text of 244 A.D. 869 (Sokoot v. Przeniczny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff provided the sum of $2,000 to enable the defendants to purchase a farm. The plaintiff brought this action to recover the amount in question, alleging that he had made a loan to the defendants upon their agreement "to repay it on demand. The defendants denied the making of a loan, and contended that the money was a gift coupled with an agreement that the plaintiff should have his home on the farm as long as he wished to live there. Whether the transaction resulted in a loan or gift was submitted to the jury, and there is sufficient evidence to justify the verdict that a loan was made. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokoot-v-przeniczny-nyappdiv-1935.