Sokolsky v. Kramer
This text of 310 F. App'x 955 (Sokolsky v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall change the docket to reflect appellant’s in forma pauperis status.
On September 26, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated December 17, 2007.
A review of the record and appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 F. App'x 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokolsky-v-kramer-ca9-2009.