Sokolowski v. Mango Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sokolowski v. Mango Products, Inc.

56 A.D.2d 1262, 869 N.Y.S.2d 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 1262 (Sokolowski v. Mango Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sokolowski v. Mango Products, Inc., 56 A.D.2d 1262, 869 N.Y.S.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered February 22, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the motion of defendant Manco Products, Inc. for leave to renew its motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Martoche, J.P, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered February 22, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the motion of defendant Manco Products, Inc. for leave to renew its motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Martoche, J.P, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 1262, 869 N.Y.S.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokolowski-v-mango-products-inc-nyappdiv-2008.