Sokolowski v. Hastrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sokolowski v. Hastrich

271 A.D.2d 950

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 950 (Sokolowski v. Hastrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sokolowski v. Hastrich, 271 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokolowski-v-hastrich-nyappdiv-1947.