Sokolov v. Village of Freeport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sokolov v. Village of Freeport

74 A.D.2d 822, 425 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10568

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 822 (Sokolov v. Village of Freeport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sokolov v. Village of Freeport, 74 A.D.2d 822, 425 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare a certain ordinance of the Village of Freeport invalid, the defendant Village of Freeport appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 1979, which declared the ordinance invalid. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, the ordinance is declared to be valid and the complaint is otherwise [823]*823dismissed. We held in Loventhal v City of Mount Vernon (51 AD2d 732) that an ordinance requiring dwelling owners to obtain a permit before letting a unit was a valid exercise of the police power and did not infringe on the owners’ Fourth Amendment rights. There is no significant difference between the instant ordinance and that involved in Loventhal. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to declare a certain ordinance of the Village of Freeport invalid, the defendant Village of Freeport appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 1979, which declared the ordinance invalid. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, the ordinance is declared to be valid and the complaint is otherwise [823]*823dismissed. We held in Loventhal v City of Mount Vernon (51 AD2d 732) that an ordinance requiring dwelling owners to obtain a permit before letting a unit was a valid exercise of the police power and did not infringe on the owners’ Fourth Amendment rights. There is no significant difference between the instant ordinance and that involved in Loventhal. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 822, 425 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokolov-v-village-of-freeport-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack