Sokol v. Sokol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sokol v. Sokol

59 A.D.2d 738, 398 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13742

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 738 (Sokol v. Sokol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sokol v. Sokol, 59 A.D.2d 738, 398 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 12, 1977, as, after a nonjury trial, directed him to make child support payments in the sum of $120 per week, and defendant cross-appeals from so much of the said judgment as granted plaintiff a divorce on the ground of abandonment. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the child support payments to the amount of $75 per week. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the amount of the award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 12, 1977, as, after a nonjury trial, directed him to make child support payments in the sum of $120 per week, and defendant cross-appeals from so much of the said judgment as granted plaintiff a divorce on the ground of abandonment. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the child support payments to the amount of $75 per week. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the amount of the award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 738, 398 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokol-v-sokol-nyappdiv-1977.