Sokol v. Sokol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sokol v. Sokol

40 A.D.2d 998, 338 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 998 (Sokol v. Sokol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sokol v. Sokol, 40 A.D.2d 998, 338 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

■In an action for separation in which a judgment was entered inter alia dismissing the complaint after a nonjury trial, the plaintiff wife appeals, as [999]*999limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 19, 1972, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying her prior motion to compel defendant to pay for certain expenses in connection with plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment, i.e., for the transcript of the trial minutes, printing of the transcript and her brief, and her counsel fee. Order modified by adding thereto, immediately after the provision that “the Court adheres to its original determination”, the following: “except that plaintiff’s prior motion is granted to the extent that defendant is directed to pay for the expense of transcribing the trial minutes.” As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The appeal from the judgment may be prosecuted upon the original papers and typewritten briefs of the parties. Each party shall serve one copy of his or her brief and file eight copies thereof. In our opinion the interests of justice warranted the granting of the relief directed herein. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■In an action for separation in which a judgment was entered inter alia dismissing the complaint after a nonjury trial, the plaintiff wife appeals, as [999]*999limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 19, 1972, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying her prior motion to compel defendant to pay for certain expenses in connection with plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment, i.e., for the transcript of the trial minutes, printing of the transcript and her brief, and her counsel fee. Order modified by adding thereto, immediately after the provision that “the Court adheres to its original determination”, the following: “except that plaintiff’s prior motion is granted to the extent that defendant is directed to pay for the expense of transcribing the trial minutes.” As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The appeal from the judgment may be prosecuted upon the original papers and typewritten briefs of the parties. Each party shall serve one copy of his or her brief and file eight copies thereof. In our opinion the interests of justice warranted the granting of the relief directed herein. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 998, 338 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokol-v-sokol-nyappdiv-1972.