Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

390 F. App'x 620
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 25, 2010
Docket09-3933
StatusUnpublished

This text of 390 F. App'x 620 (Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 390 F. App'x 620 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-91 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review); Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir.2008) (en banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160, 1162 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hern andez-Moran v. Gonzales, 408 F.3d 496, 499-500 (8th Cir.2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clifton v. Holder
598 F.3d 486 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Tamenut v. Mukasey
521 F.3d 1000 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 F. App'x 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokhna-kane-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2010.