Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Eighth Circuit

Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

390 F. App'x 620

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2010·No. 09-3933·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-91 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review); Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir.2008) (en banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160, 1162 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hern andez-Moran v. Gonzales, 408 F.3d 496, 499-500 (8th Cir.2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-91 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review); Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir.2008) (en banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160, 1162 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hern andez-Moran v. Gonzales, 408 F.3d 496, 499-500 (8th Cir.2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 390 F. App'x 620 (8th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

390 F. App'x 620 (Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related