Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Sokaitis v. Bakaysa

Sokaitis v. Bakaysa

945 A.2d 976, 286 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 25, 2008
DocketSC 18130
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 945 A.2d 976 (Sokaitis v. Bakaysa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sokaitis v. Bakaysa, 945 A.2d 976, 286 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 158 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 663 (AC 28099), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the parties’ contract was not unenforceable under General Statutes § 52-553?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*914 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18130. William J. Sweeney, Jr., in support of the petition. Sean R. Higgins, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sokaitis v. Bakaysa
975 A.2d 51 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
945 A.2d 976, 286 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokaitis-v-bakaysa-conn-2008.