Sokaitis v. Bakaysa

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sokaitis v. Bakaysa

945 A.2d 976, 286 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 158

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 25, 2008·No. SC 18130·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 663 (AC 28099), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the parties’ contract was not unenforceable under General Statutes § 52-553?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*914 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18130. William J. Sweeney, Jr., in support of the petition. Sean R. Higgins, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 663 (AC 28099), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the parties’ contract was not unenforceable under General Statutes § 52-553?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*914 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18130. William J. Sweeney, Jr., in support of the petition. Sean R. Higgins, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2008

Sokaitis v. Bakaysa, 945 A.2d 976, 286 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 158 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

945 A.2d 976 (Sokaitis v. Bakaysa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related