Home/New York Court of Appeals/Sohmer v. . Hebden

Sohmer v. . Hebden

111 N.E. 1100, 216 N.Y. 728, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 952
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 1915·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed, with costs, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below, and judgment directed for the plaintiff. ■

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ. Dissenting on opinion of Kellogg, J., below: Hiscock, Chase and Cuddeback, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sohmer v. . Hebden, 111 N.E. 1100, 216 N.Y. 728, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 952 (N.Y. 1915).

111 N.E. 1100 (Sohmer v. . Hebden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.