Sohmer v. . Hebden
111 N.E. 1100, 216 N.Y. 728, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 952
This text of 111 N.E. 1100 (Sohmer v. . Hebden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sohmer v. . Hebden, 111 N.E. 1100, 216 N.Y. 728, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 952 (N.Y. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment reversed, with costs, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below, and judgment directed for the plaintiff. ■
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ. Dissenting on opinion of Kellogg, J., below: Hiscock, Chase and Cuddeback, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 1100, 216 N.Y. 728, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sohmer-v-hebden-ny-1915.