Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc.

DecidedFebruary 18, 2021

Docket01-20-00200-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc. (Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc. Appellate case number: 01-20-00200-CV Trial court case number: 1125848 Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellants, Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma, have filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s October 25, 2019 final judgment. Appellants filed, in this Court and the trial court, an “Affidavit of Indigence,” requesting to be permitted to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. Accordingly, on December 29, 2020, the Clerk of this Court directed the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file, without advance payment of costs, a clerk’s record on indigence with all trial court filings regarding or related to appellants’ request to proceed without payment of costs on appeal, and any contest by any party to that request. On January 19, 2021, the trial court clerk filed a clerk’s record including appellants’ “Affidavit of Indigence” filed in the trial court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (b), (d). The clerk’s record does not reflect that a contest to the affidavit was filed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(f). Accordingly, appellants cannot be required to pay costs, including fees charged by the trial court clerk for the preparation of the clerk’s record, or by the court reporter(s) for preparation of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. The Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellants are allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Further, on March 11, 2020, the court reporter notified the Clerk of this Court that there is a reporter’s record. The court reporter is directed to file with this Court, within thirty days of the date of this order, and at no cost to appellants, a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __February 18, 2021____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc. Appellate case number: 01-20-00200-CV Trial court case number: 1125848 Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellants, Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma, have filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s October 25, 2019 final judgment. Appellants filed, in this Court and the trial court, an “Affidavit of Indigence,” requesting to be permitted to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. Accordingly, on December 29, 2020, the Clerk of this Court directed the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file, without advance payment of costs, a clerk’s record on indigence with all trial court filings regarding or related to appellants’ request to proceed without payment of costs on appeal, and any contest by any party to that request. On January 19, 2021, the trial court clerk filed a clerk’s record including appellants’ “Affidavit of Indigence” filed in the trial court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (b), (d). The clerk’s record does not reflect that a contest to the affidavit was filed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(f). Accordingly, appellants cannot be required to pay costs, including fees charged by the trial court clerk for the preparation of the clerk’s record, or by the court reporter(s) for preparation of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. The Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellants are allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Further, on March 11, 2020, the court reporter notified the Clerk of this Court that there is a reporter’s record. The court reporter is directed to file with this Court, within thirty days of the date of this order, and at no cost to appellants, a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __February 18, 2021____

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sogo Industries, LLC and Satishchandra Varma v. Tarquin Polymers & Colors, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sogo-industries-llc-and-satishchandra-varma-v-tarquin-polymers-colors-texapp-2021.