Sogge v. Sogge

575 P.2d 590, 94 Nev. 88, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 486
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 2, 1978
DocketNo. 9294
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 575 P.2d 590 (Sogge v. Sogge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sogge v. Sogge, 575 P.2d 590, 94 Nev. 88, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 486 (Neb. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Richard and Mary Sogge were granted a divorce on January 9, 1973. Pursuant to the decree, appellant Mary Sogge was awarded custody of the four minor children, with respondent Richard Sogge accorded reasonable visitation rights.

On May 13, 1976, respondent moved to modify the decree to change control and custody of the children. Appellant, in turn, filed a motion on June 11, 1976, for attorney’s fees and deposition costs to enable her to oppose respondent’s motion. Appellant’s affidavits filed in support of her motion stated she had received no support payments since April 30, 1976, had no money on hand or in any account, and could not afford to retain an attorney to represent her interests.

[89]*89Respondent’s affidavit filed in opposition to appellant’s motion stated he had given appellant $520,000 plus child support since the divorce. After a hearing on the motion, the trial judge ordered respondent to pay appellant’s counsel $600 as and for costs, specifically reserving his final ruling on the motion.

On October 4, 1976, the court awarded respondent custody of the children. The court also denied appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs and ordered the parties to pay their own costs. Appellant contends the district court erred in denying her motion for attorney’s fees. We disagree.

The award of attorney’s fees in divorce proceedings lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge and where, as here, the record is barren of any evidence of abuse of that discretion, the trial judge’s determination will not be disturbed on appeal. Woodruff v. Woodruff, 94 Nev. 1, 573 P.2d 206 (1978); Applebaum v. Applebaum, 93 Nev. 382, 566 P.2d 85 (1977); Fletcher v. Fletcher, 89 Nev. 540, 516 P.2d 103 (1973).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. Schwartz
812 P.2d 1268 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1991)
Burr v. Burr
611 P.2d 623 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 P.2d 590, 94 Nev. 88, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sogge-v-sogge-nev-1978.