Softview LLC v. Apple Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 6, 2024·No. 23-1006·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-1006 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 06/06/2024

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

SOFTVIEW LLC,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, Appellees

2023-1006, 2023-1008

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,635, 95/002,126.

JUDGMENT

ALAN BURNETT, Law Office of R. Alan Burnett, Bellevue , WA, argued for appellant.

PARTH SAGDEO, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Apple Inc. also represented by MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Washington, DC; MARK S. DAVIES, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC; JAMES P. MURPHY, Polsinelli PC, Houston, TX.

SONAL NARESH MEHTA, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale

Case: 23-1006 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 06/06/2024

and Dorr LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by MADELEINE C. LAUPHEIMER, Boston, MA; JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC; DAVID A. REED, Atlanta, GA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 6, 2024 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Softview LLC v. Apple Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2024).

Softview LLC v. Apple Inc. (Softview LLC v. Apple Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.