Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc.

885 So. 2d 483, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16207, 2004 WL 2411280
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 2004·No. No. 1D3-4142·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an amended final judgement entered in a non-jury case in which appellant was the plaintiff below. We find that the trial court committed no error in considering and granting appel-lee’s motion for rehearing. See Cape Royal Realty, Inc. v. Kroll, 804 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“[Tjrial court has the power and authority to completely alter or change its final judgment or order... Langer v. Aerovias, S.A., 584 So.2d 175, 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (noting that trial court, upon reconsideration, may alter its previous judgment as necessary to arrive at the correct result).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc., 885 So. 2d 483, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16207, 2004 WL 2411280 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

885 So. 2d 483 (Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cape Royal Realty, Inc. v. Kroll
804 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Langer v. Aerovias
584 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)