Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc.

885 So. 2d 483, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16207, 2004 WL 2411280

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 29, 2004

DocketNo. 1D3-4142

StatusPublished

This text of 885 So. 2d 483 (Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sofa Solutions, Inc. v. Design Build Systems, Inc., 885 So. 2d 483, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16207, 2004 WL 2411280 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an amended final judgement entered in a non-jury case in which appellant was the plaintiff below. We find that the trial court committed no error in considering and granting appel-lee’s motion for rehearing. See Cape Royal Realty, Inc. v. Kroll, 804 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“[Tjrial court has the power and authority to completely alter or change its final judgment or order... Langer v. Aerovias, S.A., 584 So.2d 175, 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (noting that trial court, upon reconsideration, may alter its previous judgment as necessary to arrive at the correct result).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an amended final judgement entered in a non-jury case in which appellant was the plaintiff below. We find that the trial court committed no error in considering and granting appel-lee’s motion for rehearing. See Cape Royal Realty, Inc. v. Kroll, 804 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“[Tjrial court has the power and authority to completely alter or change its final judgment or order... Langer v. Aerovias, S.A., 584 So.2d 175, 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (noting that trial court, upon reconsideration, may alter its previous judgment as necessary to arrive at the correct result).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

885 So. 2d 483, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16207, 2004 WL 2411280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sofa-solutions-inc-v-design-build-systems-inc-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack