Soelberg v. Jason Navigation Corp.

271 F. 951, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1901
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1921
DocketNo. 1849
StatusPublished

This text of 271 F. 951 (Soelberg v. Jason Navigation Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soelberg v. Jason Navigation Corp., 271 F. 951, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1901 (4th Cir. 1921).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On June 8, 1918, the American steamship Jason, loaded with cotton and spelter, anchored in the James river about a quarter of a mile or more off and slightly above the Warwick Machine Company’s pier at Newport News, Va. Three days later the Norwegian steamship Hésperos, light, anchored to the westward of and some three ships’ lengths ahead of the Jason. Both vessels were brought in and placed by licensed pilots. On June 12th a southwest wind arose, which gradually increased. At 2 p. m. it blew 28 miles an hour. Later in the afternoon it diminished somewhat, bitt about 9:30 in the evening developed into a severe squall, attaining for a few minutes a velocity of 60 miles an hour, and for about a minute a velocity of 68 miles. Blown by this gale, the Hésperos dragged anchor and crashed into the port side of the Jason, to the great damage of the latter and its cargo, for the recovery of which the owners brought suit. From a decree in their favor the Hésperos appeals.

It was virtually admitted at the trial, and there is no proof to the contrary, that the Jason was not at fault. This being so, responsibility rests on the Hésperos, unless the collision was the result of inevitable accident, which is the defense set up. The case, therefore, turns on a question of fact which the court below has decided against the ap[952]*952pellant. We are satisfied, after careful examination of the- record, that the learned District Judge reached the right conclusion, and find no occasion to enlarge upon what he has said. The decree is accordingly affirmed on his opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F. 951, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soelberg-v-jason-navigation-corp-ca4-1921.