Sodowich v. Heimert
160 A. 635, 109 N.J.L. 265, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 321
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Van Buseire, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sodowich v. Heimert, 160 A. 635, 109 N.J.L. 265, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 321 (N.J. 1932).
160 A. 635 (Sodowich v. Heimert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burrell v. Quaranta
612 A.2d 379 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CHURCH
242 A.2d 652 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)